Explain the difference between a Deontological and Teleological approach to Ethics

Published: 2021-07-09 16:50:06
essay essay

Category: Difference

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

GET MY ESSAY
Deontological ethical theories claim that certain actions are right or wrong in themselves, regardless of what the consequence is. For example Natural Law. However Teleological ethical theories look at the consequence and result of an action to see if it is right or if it is wrong. For example Situation ethics. The difference between teleological and Deontological ethics is outcome of act verses the act itself. Teleological ethics denotes even if the act was wrong but the outcome turned out good then it is considered good. Deontological deals more with the intention of doing a good deed but may have had a bad result
Teleological moral systems are characterized primarily by a focus on the consequences which any action might have (for that reason, they are often referred to as consequentalist moral systems, and both terms are used here). Thus, in order to make correct moral choices, we have to have some understanding of what will result from our choices. When we make choices which result in the correct consequences, then we are acting morally; when we make choices which result in the incorrect consequences, then we are acting immorally.
Deontological moral systems are characterized primarily by a focus upon adherence to independent moral rules or duties. Thus, in order to make the correct moral choices, we simply have to understand what our moral duties are and what correct rules exist which regulate those duties. When we follow our duty, we are behaving morally. When we fail to follow our duty, we are behaving immorally. In natural law Aristotle stated that there is a universal natural law that our whole world should follow, and this law is determined by a supernatural power.
Later in the 13th century Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s theory and said this supernatural power was God. This theory is an absolutist theory, and most absolutist theories are de-ontologically ethical, however some are not. Situation ethics was developed in the 1960’s by Joseph Fletcher as a reaction to Christian legalism and antinomianism, this is the belief that there are no fixed moral principled but morality is the result of spontaneous acts. There are four rules to situation ethics and six fundamental principles which, according to Fletcher, is what the whole ethical theory depends on.
Teleological ethical theories are consequential in nature because they assert that the morally correct action is one that produces the greatest balance of good over bad consequences compared with alternative actions. Deontological ethical theories are non-consequential and regard the rightness or wrongness of an action as intrinsic to the action itself. There, the consequences are morally irrelevant. Utilitarianism is the best-known teleological theory. Deontological theories include Kant’s categorical imperative, human rights theories, and divine command theories.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!

GET UNIQUE ESSAY

We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read