Therefore, by working with instead of against the seasons they didn’t have a large influence on the landscape. Since they worked with the seasons they would move whenever the resource they needed was not in season. Therefore they wouldn’t stay in one place too long to create a large impact. 3. Did the Native Americans have a concept of land ownership? If so, what was it? What did it mean to own the land for a Native American? For the most part Native Americans didn’t have a concept of land ownership. The tribes were very mobile and didn’t stay in one place.
They moved from place to place along with the seasons so everything was made so that it could be mobile and could be moved when needed. They did not believe in owning the land however they believe that they should live off of the land. 4. How did the Native Americans use the land they occupied? What did they consider good use for land? Bad use? Native Americans used the land that they had to survive. They moved around seasons to season in order to get the resources that they needed. They would fish if there was a water source around or if there were a lot of land or a forest they would hunt.
They considered food and home a good use for land; anywhere they could live. Europeans 1. How did the European Colonists occupy the land in New England? The European colonists came to New England and started raping the land almost immediately. The consensus was to take as much as they could and use it since most of what they took was going back to Europe regardless. However with that being said; they struggled when it came to living off of the land and sustaining them. They also forced many Native Americans off of their land and used it for commercial reasons. 2.
How did their “occupation” influence the natural development of the landscape? How did they alter the landscape? The main export to Europe was Tobacco. The Tobacco plant would drain the soil of nutrients and leave it barren. This would leave an area unsustainable for the growth of anything else. The animals that they brought would graze further out because the Europeans had no way to keep up the food for the animals. This would allow them to expand and spread out and develop even more land therefore their presence was great. 3. Did the European Colonists have a concept of land ownership?
If so, what was it? What did it mean to own the land for a European Colonist? The Europeans definitely had a concept of land ownership. The land that they took or occupied would be theirs and they could do with it what they wished. The more land the merrier. In England land was very scarce however it wasn’t in New England. Owning land gave Europeans the power to vote and make influence changes around them. It allowed them to feel as if they were important in changing the world around them. 4. How did the Europeans use the land they occupied?
What did they consider good use for land? Bad use? They used the land to grow crops and create a functional society. They used the land to create a way of life, which they were unable to do in England. They used it for infrastructure; building homes, churches and businesses. Interactions 1. In what ways did the European colonists view natural resources as commodities? Identify a four items European colonists commodified, then explain the value of these items for colonists? a. Wood a. They used wood for homes and shelter. They also burned it to keep warm.
A lot of wood in England was already cleared and gone so it was a scarcity in England but not the New World. This was a tremendous commodity to the colonists. b. Birds a. The birds that the colonists were used to back in Europe were smaller and less tasteful than these new fowl that was found in the New World. Also there was a bountiful amount in New England. c. Fish a. They used fish for food. There are a lot of nutrients in fish and are considered easy to digest. The abundance of fish in the new world was considered a commodity. d. Beasts (Mammals) a.
In the forest they had many beasts such as bears and moose. The meat from these creatures were more plentiful and delicious than fish and bird therefore could feed more people. They also used their pelts to warm themselves in the cold. A lot of these creatures were not in England and were there year round in the New World. 2. How did the European attempts at commodifying (viewing natural resources as items to be bought and sold) the environment influence their interactions with the Native Americans? Did the Native Americans commodify natural resources things?
The Europeans bucked heads many times with the Native Americans over their treatment of the land. The colonists would abuse the land and ended up killing a lot of vegetation and trees. This was due to the way that they would burn. Their way was different from the Native Americans whose idea was to spare as much as they could of the land. It was the Europeans disrespect for the land, which angered the Native Americans. 3. How did the differing ideas of land ownership that existed between European Colonists and Native Americans lead to trouble between the two cultures?
The Native Americans didn’t have any concept of land ownership due to them moving around constantly where as the Europeans brought over the thought of living someplace permanently and using it as private property and doing what they wanted. This angered the Native Americans because they were happy with their way of living and thought that the Europeans were in excess and wondered why the Europeans would want so much. It was also the disrespect of the land that the Europeans seemed to have that angered the Native Americans. 4.
In what ways did the Native Americans alter their own culture in order to adapt to the European ideas of land ownership, land occupation, and the commodification of natural resources? The Native Americans responded with hostility towards the Europeans simply because they were confused at their way of life and thought it was different so they didn’t condone what was happening. Eventually, however, they started doing trade with the Europeans. This trade gave the Europeans a different lookout on the Europeans and gave them things that they otherwise would have been unable to obtain.