Stem cells are used in medical advances due to their regenerating aspect, but now that cysts also have this capability, some might prefer the use of a cyst over the use of a stem cell. This text would be used to refute an argument that stem cells are the only option available at the moment to patients. This study could be used in the body paragraphs arguing that there are other options other than embryonic and adult stem cells.
This text could also be used in the conclusion to emphasize the pace at which research is being conducted, to prove that embryonic stem cells are not the only option available to patients. In the conclusion the author could use this case study to convince the audience that more funding is necessary for research regarding the classifications of stem cells and their aspects, in order to find an alternative source which could replace stem cells ultimately. This scholarly journal is an academic source.
The article has in text citations and references at the end of the article, showing how much research and time was put into this academic journal. An abstract is given at the beginning of the journal to give the reader an outline of what will be covered in the journal, another aspect supporting that this source is reliable. “Episode 6: Miracle Cell Special Report The Stem Cell Controversy. ” PBS. Educational Broadcasting Corporation. 2004. Web. 10 Oct. 2013.
The article published by PBS The Stem Cell Controversy gives an overview of what stem cells are, the difference between adult and embryonic stem cells, the controversy over the medical use of embryonic stem cells to treat certain illnesses, the policy behind this type of research in the United states, and the impact after the use of stem cells on certain patients. This source could be used in various sections of a text because it covers such detail surrounding the topic. The information from this article could be used in the opening background of the
text to familiarize the reader with different medical terminology that one would typically not be familiar with. The statistics and different case studies found in this article could be used to support an argument either for or against embryonic stem cell research, given that both sides of the issue are presented equally. A specific feature of this article is the section that discusses the impact of this research on specific patients. This section of text would be helpful particularly in a debate paper to support the research for embryonic stem cell research because of the emotional appeal found through a patient’s interview.
This source is somewhat credible. The information is recent, published in 2004, and PBS is an organization that is non-for-profit and most often is used to educate the public on a wide variety of topics. Li, Jin, et al. “Epidermal Stem Cells In Orthopaedic Regenerative Medicine. ” International Journal Of Molecular Sciences 14. 6 (2013): 11626-11642. Web. 1 Nov. 2013. This academic article concentrates on the advances which have been made with epidermal stem cell studies on both the molecular and cellular levels.
It discussed the immune- privileged property along with the ease accessibility, making it favorable for clinical application. The article demonstrates the biological characteristics of these cells and their potential in the medical field, in particular orthopedics. Specifically in the field of orthopedics in the treatment of healing, spinal cord injuries, and muscle and bone remodeling in some special cases. This article can be used in the introduction of an author’s paper to give the reader an overview of what epidermal stem cells are, as well as their purpose in medical treatment.
This article can be used in a conclusion as well because the full affects of this stem cell in particular have yet to be determined, which could assist in helping the author persuade the audience to believe that stem cell research has such a great amount of potential if it were to receive more support. This article was published in 2013 along with the references at the bottom of the article as well as in text citations support the research found through this case study to be true and academically reliable.
Machado, Luciana, and Arnaldo Rodrigues Santos Jr. “Stem Cells And Cell Therapy: From Basic Sciences To Clinical Perspectives. ” Journal Of Biomedical Science & Engineering 6. 6 (2013): 683-692. Web. 1 Nov. 2013. This scholarly journal gives the reader an overview of what stem cells are, distinguishes the two different types of stem cells, as well as listing different types of stem cells which are still being studied such as bone marrow, umbilical cord, and Adipose tissue stem cells.
This article goes into the different therapeutic applications of the various stem cells especially in orthopedics, dentistry, rheumatology, and cardiology. Evidence of successful trials are presented in this article as well as trials which were not so successful, but thus helping researchers further the study of stem cell research regardless of controversial opinions towards the topic. This text could be used in the introduction of the paper to explain the scientific differences between adult and embryonic stem cells and to educate the audience on the various types of stem cells.
The uses of the stem cells in various areas of medicine mentioned in this article can be used to convince the audience of the research needed to continue this expansion. The progress that has come from the stem cell therapy on patients can be used to support the author’s position towards the topic that stem cell research will benefit more than it would hurt. The information in this article can be used in a conclusion to emphasize the idea that stem cell research has advanced thus far and will continue to grow with the support of more people.
This academic article was published in 2013 and also has in text citations as well as references at the end of the article, proving that the information provided is accurate and thus reliable. Stein, Rob. “Controversy Over Stem- Cell Research Keeps Charities On Sidelines. ” NPR. Shots, 7 Feb. 2012. Web. 10 Oct. 2013. This article published by NPR evaluates the position of the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation and their position behind stem cell research.
Statements were given by representatives from the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research, researchers from Harvard University, and the chief science officer at the American Heart Association all regarding the possible effects of stem cell research on cancer patients. The information from this article could be used in text to support research for embryonic stem cell research because of the backing these new studies are receiving from such prominent organizations and researchers. The information
can also be used to persuade the audience because of the specific organizations mentioned in this article. These organizations are non-for-profit and depend on the people to support their organizations. If the audience is persuaded to believe that stem cell research is a good step forward, it could be revolutionary for this area of study. NPR has previously been accused of having a slight liberal bias. The information presented in this article was published in 2012, making the information current and therefore more reliable.