The impact of these cases on contemporary education will also be explained. Furthermore, this research paper will include the responsibilities of schools to accommodate the needs of designated students as well as how these accommodations negatively affect the learning environment. Over the last few decades, in Europe, the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, increasing numbers of higher education teachers and researchers have been concentrating on how to improve the quality of teaching and learning.
First of all the Educational leaders must be well informed of the laws that keep an eye on the function and management of educational institutions. This is very important to be done in this regard. Furthermore, there is a need that the educational leaders should implement good judgment in creating reasonable and legally defendable decisions that concern students.
Educational leaders will also need to direct the development and implementation of reliable and well-developed policies, rules, and regulations pertaining to students. The Bill of Rights characterizes an essential foundation of individual rights and freedoms given to individuals under the US Constitution. The Constitution of the US, which is a principle source of law, imparts an outline of law in which governmental processes function.
Although the Constitution does not refer to education, the Constitution and Supreme Court decisions, do influence the function and management of educational organizations, altogether with respect to amendments, that safeguard the individual rights of student. Furthermore school administrators have a responsibility to develop an appreciation for the significance of landmark cases and be able to recognize similar patterns of fact that one may encounter in an educational setting.
In order for any essential improvements to be accomplished within any educational institute. All individual involved must commit to their improvements. At present, various educational institutions all through the country are attempting whole-school reform, which necessitates considerable modifications in teacher, and administrator actions utilizing the federal funding.
Impact on Contemporary Education
An implication concerning student code of conduct is that school officials are not liable for harassment claims unless he or she were aware of the behavior and failed to respond accordingly. However, if students are aware of such behavior, the difficulty might be for school leaders to claim ignorance to the behavior and therefore be susceptible to liability charges.
Landmark cases contain judicial opinions and manage issues in a proper routine that should a permanent part of educational settings. School officials must appreciate and comprehend the importance of these cases to education. Legal concerns frequently mentioned in landmark cases include the application and safeguards of First Amendment rights, student code of conduct and managing students with exceptional needs. Laws exist to protect the rights of designated students and the school districts responsibility to these kind of students.
Landmark Cases concerning Student Code of Conducts
Harassment is a type of sexual discrimination. In a landmark case, the Supreme Court ruled that public schools might be sued for failing to contend with students who harass their classmates. The Supreme Court also specified that lawsuits are applicable only when the harassing student’s behavior is severely bad, persistent, offensive, and denies the victim equal access to an education. In addition, harassment claims are valid only when school officials are noticeably unreasonable and intentionally indifferent toward the alleged harassing behavior.
The student, LaShonda Davis, who is black, filed suit against the school district in 1992 claiming that school officials failed to take action concerning harassment by a white student, but later took action when the same student offended another white student. Reasonable suspicion is all that is required for school officials to initiate a search. The U.S. Supreme Court has decided that when a school official is conducting a search under reasonable suspicion in school-related searches, he or she is not violating any constitutional rights.
In the landmark case, New Jersey v. T.L.O. in the year 1985 a teacher revealed two girls smoking in a girl’s restroom. T.L.O, one of the students in the restroom denied the allegation while her companion stated that she violated school rules. The assistant vice principal insisted upon examination of the girl’s purse and found a pack of cigarettes.
At the time, the assistant vice principal also noticed a pack of rolling papers typically associated with the use of marijuana, and with this evidence of drug use, the assistant vice principal thoroughly examined the purse. Numerous indications of not only drug use but the sale of drugs was obtained from the purse.